Skip to content

Category: Random crap

What doesn’t fit anywhere else.

“I Could Do That” vs. “I Wish I Could Do That.”

There are two reactions most people have when reading what someone else has written.

One is “I could do that.”

The other is “I wish I could do that!”

Most people assume that we would rather have people think “I wish I could do that” — admire our flowing prose and six-dimensional characters as they lose themselves in the universe that we hew out of the chaos of the blank page in six glorious days like the gods we are — instead of looking at our prose the way someone looks at a Jackson Pollock painting and think “pfft. I could do that!”

Me? I’d rather people think “I could do that.”

You see, when people have that reaction to your work, it means you’ve been more successful. You make it look effortless. Your plot flows out of your characters naturally, and your dialogue sounds like people really speak. People think “I could do that” because your work is so real that they don’t notice all the work you went through to make it that way.

Take, for example, John Finnemore. When I listen to his radio sitcom Cabin Pressure my first reaction is always “I could write like that.” Then I listen more carefully and I notice the craftsmanship. I realize that it isn’t Martin Crieff and Douglas Richardson having banter back and forth; it’s Benedict Cumberbatch and Roger Allam playing roles quite unlike what they’ve become known for. But the dialogue seems so natural — so real — that for a moment you lose yourself in the magic.

Essentially, if they think they could write like you, they’re seeing the art. If they wish they could write like you, they’re seeing the artifice.

And I’d rather been an artist or artisan than artificial.

Leave a Comment

A Call for the Abolition of the Apostrophe

“Well I told ’em right then”, Fido said
“It should be easy to see
The crux of the biscuit
is the apostrophe”

– Frank Zappa, “Stink Foot”

As a general in the Grammar Wars, and oft-wounded veteran of said conflict, it is not easy for me to admit defeat. However, in at least one battle against the continuing deterioration of the proper forms of the English language, it’s time to take a lesson from Czar Alexander after the Battle of Borodino, and burn the mutha to the ground so to speak.

It’s time to just get rid of the apostrophe.

Don’t deny it. You’ve felt the same thing. Not only when reading Facebook status updates from friends who allegedly have at least some kind of college education or looking at greeting cards that wish you “Happy Holidays from the Savidge’s” (from the Savidge’s what?), but also when piecing words together yourself. There isn’t a single one of us who hasn’t accidentally typed “its” instead of “it’s” either with or without the help of a smartphone’s auto-miscorrect feature. The sheer abundance of greengrocer’s apostrophes out there has reached the point of being a blot on the landscape.

So why do we even bother with this archaic piece of punctuation while wonderful marks like the interrobang and the snark, which can actually be of use in written English, languish?

Contractions

While contractions have a long and storied history in the English language, they really have morphed into something entirely different. Our brains have wired themselves over the centuries not to think of contractions as shortenings of two or more words (unless you’re Data) but as words unto themselves.

The confusion between the “you–” words is a perfect example. The reason that certain people today tend to type “your” or “youre” instead of “you’re” isn’t that they’re illiterate or ignorant (although a fair chunk of them are) it’s that they literally don’t think of “you’re” as being “you are.” To them “you’re” is a distinct word which just happens to be a synonym of the two word phrase “you are.” The same can be said for “there” and “they’re;” people aren’t thinking “they are” and shortening it to a contraction, they are thinking “they’re.”

Now let’s look at won’t. This is a mutated contraction and qualifies as a distinct word. What letters are being deleted in the contraction? Not a one. Under normal English contraction rules the contraction would be willn’t, wiln’t, or win’t. But because these sound awkward our language has taken the phrase “wont not” from Shakespeare’s time and substituted its contraction for what would be the proper one for won’t. Won’t is its own unique creature and today the apostrophe in it is archaic and superfluous.

So, despite being immortalized by Tom Lehrer, it’s time “N Apostrophe T” just faded off into the distance to be replaced by “nt.”

Contradictory and Conflated Rules

Remember, always use “‘s” to denote possesion. Uh, unless you are saying “its.” Or “hers.” Or “theirs.” Or “ours.” Or the noun ends in an s. Or sometimes an x. Or a soft c sound. Or you’re using British spelling rules. Unless those British spelling rules are modern British instead of classic British.

Let’s face it. The rules for writing possesion are not as easy nowadays as Professor Strunk once insisted. They weren’t even that easy when he was writing. (Has anyone ever really written “conscience'” as a possessive form, or told someone they have a “heel of Achilles?”) And they get even more and more complex day by day. This is “Sungenis’ Blog” after all, in which he praises “Groucho Marx’ wit.”

British style has been trending away from using apostrophes in general possessives for some time (“mens clothing,” “peoples bank,” “ladies washroom” etc.) and it’s time to once again copy the Queen’s English. For the most part these possessive apostrophes are unneeded and outdated.

Science Fiction

C’thulhu F’thagn R’leyh T’Pau Q’apla Shur’tugal Ra’zac Zar’roc T’ai T’gentu’gat Wi’tch and so on.Stop the insanity!

If getting rid of the apostrophe means that sci-fi writers will lose their favorite crutch in creating names that look exotic and hard to pronounce on paper then so be it, the apostrophe must die!

Conclusion

This will not be an easy transition. It will not happen overnight. But it must happen, and happen soon. Our language will be the better for it.

Let’s get rid of the apostrophe.

Leave a Comment

Writer Beware Redux – “America’s Next Author.”

There’s another “contest” out there calling itself “America’s Next Author.” They’re promising prizes of up to $5,000.00 for a winning short story.

But when you read the rules, there are some hiccups.

5. GRANT OF RIGHTS. By submitting an Entry you grant eBookMall the publication rights to your Entry during the contest and 12 months after the completion of the contest.

Umm…no. By submitting you should only be offering an option for rights, which they would exercise if you win one of the three awards. Simply by entering this contest you’re granting all publication rights (which includes all media) to your submission, whether you win or not or get any kind of compensation.

So let’s say you write a story and submit it to them. You don’t win the contest. A month later you turn around and sell it to The New Yorker for a nice chunk of change. The people running this contest can turn around and sue you for not only every penny you just earned but for statutory damages as well because you’d already granted publication rights to them by virtue of these rules.

Also…

In addition, to the extent that any moral rights (for example, the right to attribution and the right to integrity) apply, you waive (and to the extent that these rights may not be waived, agree irrevocably not to assert) your moral rights in your Entry for purposes of this Contest

Never surrender your moral rights, especially without payment. Do you see where they say “the right to attribution?” That means you give them the right to publish your work, even if you don’t get paid for it, without even identifying you as the author.

Always remember, read the rules in their entirety before you enter a contest.

Leave a Comment